Mezhepler Tarihi: Muhammed Ebu Zehra. 1 like. Book. Mezhepler Tarihi. Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Mezhepler Tarihi – Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Category: Religious. Description. MUHAMMED EBU ZEHRA, ÝSLÂMDA SIYASÎ VE ÝTIKADÎ MEZHEPLER TARIHI (A HISTORY OF POLITICAL AND THEOLOGICAL SCHOOLS IN ISLAM)

Author: Vijar Gosar
Country: Austria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 17 April 2007
Pages: 168
PDF File Size: 13.10 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.60 Mb
ISBN: 240-5-54070-197-5
Downloads: 93477
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vibei

What are the reasons of the difference in views about Islamic issues?

The one who reaches to its back says that this is a creature like high hills. Each one grabs an organ of the elephant and tries to imagine what it mezhepper. The difference in the capacity of understanding and insight: The one who grabs its ear says that it is a flat and thin creature that can be folded up.

If looked into as a whole, not separately, the truth will be better understood. Some blind reach the place of an mzhepler. Skip to main content. And these groups have principles and measures of their own.

Even twins of a family raised in the same culture, under the same material and spiritual circumstances, and instructed zehhra the same teachers may disagree in some issues.

For example, there are differences in the way the scholars of fiqh Islamic Jurisprudence and theology view the Quran.

There are zehrra different groups of jobs. So, each group of job will proceed in accordance with their principles. Every person penetrates into an aspect of the truth. So everyone takes the statements of the one he imitates as the truth; thus, the disagreements in history continue without changing. One of the reasons of the disagreement is the imitation of the old; because imitation causes blind and faulty conviction.

WikiZero – Şablon:İtikadî mezhepler

Log in Create new account Random Question. So, even if they are wrong, he insists on his views. Disagreements arise because everyone has different desires, interests, zhera dispositions.


Thus the issue which is seen as two sided is understood and it is seen that they do not contradict one another. For this reason, Socrates says, If the thing upon which disagreement exits is known, every disagreement stops. The one who grabs one of its legs says that this is a long and round animal similar to a trunk of a tree.

This being the case, people growing up in different environments will show differences. About this issue, Spinoza says, What shows us the matter beautiful is our desires and tendencies. This is one of the reasons why the learned differed in their views and sects. If I may put it this way, as it is better to look at the elephant and depict it as a whole; it is also better to look at the verses of the Koran as a whole.

So, Man wills and God creates. For example, while it is mentioned in the Koran about the free will of the human, it is also stated that all kinds of will and power are peculiar to God.

This kind of a desire leads someone to the conviction that what he says is the ultimate truth and the opposite views are absolutely wrong. Wherever is human there is disagreement, because this is part of the characteristics of human. For this reason, the matter will sehra better understood if all the verses about the issue are looked into.

Otherwise, it ehu be thought that everyone says the truth at the first glance; but in reality the conclusion they reach is defective and lacking. I want to ask a question.

Therefore; while there are verses supporting the Mutazile who says that people create their own deeds and that God has no intervention in the deeds of His slaves; there are also mezhrpler supporting the Cebriyye who says that people have no will and that they are like leaves in the wind against the will of God.


Abu Zahra says that in the letters of the institution Ihvanussafa these are related about this issue: In addition, there are the ones who are stupid, whose hearts are blind and confused.

There are lots of people whose capacity of understanding is high, evaluation precise, and reflection keen. The fact that the issues that are open to disagreement are actually unclear: People cannot be far from the truth, as well as they cannot mexhepler it to the full.

The example of Plato clarifies this issue very well: In order to make a comment, please login or register. Most often, the disagreements arise not because the issues are unclear or hard to comprehend, but because each side of the disagreement does not know the view of the other. Besides the factor of creation, the other factors having effect in this matter are shortly as follow: What are the reasons of the difference in views about Islamic issues?

As is seen, each of them understood just one part of the truth, declared their friends wrong, and claimed that they are mistaken in the understanding of the truth. In the things man wills he cannot escape responsibility.

As their understanding and capacities differ, their views and beliefs differ likewise. Wherever there is blind conviction, it is just natural that excessive disagreements exist, because the mentality of imitation kills the objective reasoning and causes the minds to become dim.